Articulation |
Prepared by:
Prepared for BCCAT by Nick Heath, Nicholas Heath Consulting Services Inc. November 2008.Table of Contents
- History
- Current Situation
- How to Use This Guide
- Policy, Procedure and Record-Keeping
- Assessing Transfer and Articulation Requests
- Formal Articulation Versus Case-by-Case Assessment
- Functionality of the TCES
- Technology and Transfer Credit
- Training Needs within Institutions
- Effective Date Ranges
- Consistency of Process
- Volume of Articulation Requests
- Timeliness
- Cost of Articulating
- Some Principles to Live By
- Appendix 1
- Appendix 2
- Acknowledgement
1. History
Traditionally in the BC Transfer System, only universities granted undergraduate and graduate degrees and were exclusively the receiving institutions in the transfer equation. The senders were the institutes and community colleges that offered post-secondary certificates and diplomas and university transfer courses. Senders request articulation and receivers grant or deny the requests. The significant flow of students then was from the institutes and colleges to the universities, enabling access to degree completion. Articulation agreements were printed in hard-copy transfer guides and reflected this relatively simple relationship.
| In 1995, the provincial government empowered BCIT, ECU and several of the community colleges, subsequently called "university-colleges" and now "teaching intensive universities", to grant four-year undergraduate degrees. Two-year undergraduate degrees and private institutions having Minister's consent to offer undergraduate programs are also relatively recent developments. These developments allowed some traditionally sending institutions to become receivers and some to also become both senders and receivers. The BC Transfer Guide grew in both volume and complexity becoming increasingly unwieldy and an online public database was developed to record and publish the thousands of course-to-course and other transfer relationships. The BC Transfer Guide is now published exclusively online and the underlying database structure is scalable to manage a large number of transfer agreements. | Students are moving more often and in different directions. This requires multi-directional articulation. |
As the transfer system evolved, so have student mobility patterns. With more institutions, program types and transfer options available, students are moving more often and in different directions than before. This requires multi-directional articulation.
2. Current Situation
The BC Transfer System refers, collectively, to the group of institutions in British Columbia and the Yukon Territory between which students transfer under formal articulation agreements. Member institutions articulate post-secondary and undergraduate level transfer credit primarily at the first and second year level. Table 1 below lists all system institutions by type and defines which are senders, receivers or both. The institution's code is shown after each institution's name and is used throughout this guide.
Province-wide consultations were held on whether the BC post-secondary transfer system, as reflected in the BC Transfer Guide, was in need of expansion, renewal or radical change (BCCAT 2006). The developing consensus was that planning should occur for multi-directional and multi-level transfers, and that an expansion in the roles of some institutions is acceptable. Further, care must be taken not to compromise the existing system and not to create undue or unsustainable workloads at institutions. Incremental change is seen as more likely to yield success than wholesale reform.
Institution |
Code |
Sends |
Receives |
| Alexander College* | ALEX |
||
| BC Institute of Technology | BCIT |
||
| Camosun College | CAMO |
||
| Capilano University | CAPU |
||
| College of New Caledonia | CNC |
||
| College of the Rockies | COTR |
||
| Columbia College | COLU |
||
| Coquitlam College | COQU |
||
| Corpus Christie College | CCC |
||
| Douglas College | DOUG |
||
| Emily Carr University | ECU |
||
| Farleigh Dickenson University* | FDU |
n/a - has no course-to-course articulations |
|
| Justice Institute of BC | JIBC |
n/a - has no course-to-course articulations |
|
| Kwantlen Polytechnic University | KWAN |
||
| Langara College | LANG |
||
| Nicola Valley Institute of Technology | NVIT |
||
| North Island College | NIC |
||
| Northern Lights College | NLC |
||
| Northwest Community College | NWCC |
||
| Okanagan College | OC |
||
| Quest University* | QU |
n/a - has no course-to-course articulations |
|
| Royal Roads University | RRU |
n/a - has no course-to-course articulations |
|
| Selkirk College | SELK |
||
| Simon Fraser University | SFU |
||
| Sprott-Shaw Community College* | SSCC |
||
| Thompson Rivers University | TRU |
||
| Thompson Rivers University, Open Learning | TRU-OL |
||
| Trinity Western University | TWU |
||
| University Canada West* | UCW |
n/a - has no course-to-course articulations |
|
| University of BC - Okanagan Campus | UBCO |
||
| University of BC - Vancouver Campus | UBC |
||
| University of Northern BC | UNBC |
||
| University of Phoenix* | UOP |
||
| University of the Fraser Valley | UFV |
||
| University of Victoria | UVIC |
||
| Vancouver Community College | VCC |
||
| Vancouver Island University | VIU |
||
| Yukon College | YUKO |
||
3. How to Use This Guide
This guide has been developed primarily for institutions in the BC Transfer System interested in seeking designation as receiving institutions. Institutions are encouraged to consult this guide and use those sections most relevant to their needs. In addition, BCCAT's excellent How to Articulate Handbook (Finlay, 2005) contains a wealth of practical advice on most process and policy issues surrounding articulation. It would be redundant for the Best Practice Guide to cover the same topics; therefore this guide should be used in combination with the How to Articulate Handbook.
